evaluation parsing systems call participation evaluation parsing systems granada spain workshop part first international conference language resource evaluation university granada th th http cere ugr e rubio elra html detail register workshop provide forum researcher interest development evaluation natural language grammar parse system creation syntactically annotate reference corpus organiser john carroll roberto basilus nicoletta calzolarus robert gaizauska gregory grefenstette accepted papers survey parser evaluation method john carroll ted briscoe university sussex university cambridge uk evaluate robust parser italian language roberto basilus maria teresa pazienza fabio massimo zanzotto universita dus roma tor verga rome italy evaluation syntactic analysis component information extraction system german thierry declerck judith klein guenter neumann dfki saarbruecken germany chunk italian linguistic taskorient evaluation stefano federicus simonetta montemagnus vito pirrellus ilccnr pisa italy modify exist annotate corpus general comparative evaluation parse rob gaizauska mark hepple chri huyck university sheffield uk dependency base evaluation minipar dekang lin university manitoba canada evaluate parse speak language dialogue system wolfgang minker lin chase limsi france corpus base parse prune sonja mueller landmann ibm heidelberg germany tosca parse system review nelleke oostdijk katholieke universiteit nijmegen netherland grammar parser evaluation xtag project sriniva bangalore anoop sarkar christine doran beth ann hockey att lab research ircs university pennsylvanium usa workshop scope aims aim workshop provide forum discussion evaluation method parse system proposal development syntactically annotate language resource increase attention evaluation component technology language engineer evaluation parse system rapidly become key issue numerous method propose while one parseval penn treebank scheme gain wide usage extent due absence workable alternative rather wholeheart support parseval ptb evaluation several limitation drawback include commitment particular style grammatical analysis oversensitivity certain innocuous type misanalysis while fail penalise common type serious mistake original publish description scheme evaluation software widely distribute followup specific english language currently alternative workable scheme proposal need fully discuss workshop provide opportunity debate workshop particularly timely large number cec language engineer project involve parse one form another need evaluate share result effort parse essential part many larger application information extraction gain importance over few often system strength parser grammar direct effect desire result thus achieve result rest able determine improve weakness parser grammar without reliable parser evaluation method cannot effectively parse evaluation workshop appropriate imminent creation largescale syntactically annotate resource european language contribution those involve activity welcome improve communication between resource construction resource utilisation community ensure resource construct maximally useful general language engineer community workshop jointly organise cec language engineer project sparkle ecran programme committee roberto basilus gregory grefenstette ted briscoe mark hepple nicoletta calzolarus tony mcenery john carroll maria teresa pazienza roberta catizone paolum velardus robert gaizauska yorick wilk 